top of page


IN NAME ONLY
John 2:6 that anyone who claims to abide in Him ought to walk just as He walked.
IN NAME ONLY
John 3:36: "Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life. Whoever rejects or disobeys the Son will not see life, and the wrath of God remains or abides on him".
John 14:15: Jesus tells His followers, "If you love me, you will obey my commandments", linking genuine love for Christ directly to living out His instructions.
1 John 2:3–6: This passage notes that people show they truly know God by keeping His word, and that claiming to know Him while continuing to disobey makes a person's words untruthful.
Proverbs 28:9 states: "If one turns away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer is an abomination"
1. Following the Example of Yeshua
Question: "We are told in 1 John 2:6 that anyone who claims to abide in Him ought to walk just as He walked. Did Yeshua ever break the Sabbath, eat unclean meats, or discard the Father’s commandments?"
Question: "In Matthew 7:21–23, Yeshua warned that many who call Him 'Lord, Lord' will be turned away because they practiced lawlessness (anomia / Torah-lessness). If we ignore God’s law, how do we distinguish our walk from what He warned against?"
Question: "Yeshua said in John 14:15, 'If you love Me, keep My commandments.' If obedience isn't necessary for a believer, why did Yeshua make it the primary evidence of our love for Him?"
Question: "In Matthew 5:17–19, Yeshua stated plainly that He did not come to destroy the Law or the Prophets, and that not one jot or tittle would pass from the Law until heaven and earth pass away. Heaven and earth are still here—so on whose authority do we say the commandments passed away?"
2. The Seventh-Day Sabbath
Question: "God sanctified and set apart the seventh day at Creation (Genesis 2:1–3) and wrote it into stone with His own finger (Exodus 20:8–11). Where in Scripture did the Father or Yeshua ever revoke that holiness or move it to another day?"
Question: "Luke 4:16 says it was Yeshua’s custom to keep the Sabbath, and Paul continued that exact custom with both Jews and Gentiles (Acts 17:2). If the apostles followed Yeshua's example decades after the resurrection, who gave the church permission to change it?"
Question: "Isaiah 66:22–23 prophesies that in the New Heavens and New Earth, all flesh will still come to worship before God from Sabbath to Sabbath. If it was kept in Genesis, practiced by Yeshua, and will be kept in eternity, why would it be abolished today?"
3. Biblical Dietary Laws & Holiness
Question: "In Leviticus 11:44–45, God says, 'Be holy, for I am holy,' specifically in the context of what we put into our bodies. Peter quotes that exact phrase in 1 Peter 1:15–16. Did God’s standard of holiness regarding what defiles the body ever change?"
Question: "In Isaiah 66:15–17, when the Lord returns in fire to execute judgment, He explicitly judges those 'eating swine's flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse.' If Yeshua made all animals clean to eat, why is eating them judged when He returns?"
Question: "1 Corinthians 6:19–20 says our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit. Would the Spirit of God dwell in an earthly temple filled with things the Father called an abomination?"
4. God’s Appointed Times (Moedim) vs. Man-Made Traditions
Question: "In Leviticus 23:2, God calls Passover, Unleavened Bread, and the Feast of Tabernacles His appointed feasts, not just 'Jewish feasts,' and calls them statutes forever. Why have we replaced the Father's calendar with traditions rooted in pagan customs that Scripture warns against adopting (Deuteronomy 12:30–32)?"
Question: "In 1 Corinthians 5:7–8, Paul tells the believers in Corinth: 'Yeshua our Passover is sacrificed for us: therefore let us keep the feast.' Why does modern tradition teach that these feasts ended at the cross when the apostles were still telling believers to keep them?"
Question: "Zechariah 14:16–19 states that during the Millennial reign, every nation that does not come up to keep the Feast of Tabernacles will receive no rain. If the feasts were done away with, why will Yeshua enforce them upon the whole earth when He rules?"
5. Faith vs. The Law
Question: "Paul asks in Romans 3:31, 'Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.' How does modern teaching claim that faith in Yeshua abolishes the law, when Paul explicitly said the opposite?"
Question: "In Revelation 12:17 and Revelation 14:12, the saints in the end times are defined by two things: they keep the commandments of God and have the faith of Yeshua. If grace does away with the commandments, why are they the defining mark of the saints in Revelation?"
In Acts 10, Peter himself gives the direct, inspired interpretation of the sheet vision. Scripture does not leave the meaning open to assumption—Peter explicitly explains what God showed him twice.
1. Peter's Direct Interpretation: It Is About People, Not Food
When Peter arrives at the house of the Gentile centurion Cornelius, he states the exact meaning of the vision:
"And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean."
— Acts 10:28 (KJV)
Peter does not say, "God has showed me that I may now eat pork or shellfish." He plainly states: "God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean."
2. The Context Within the Chapter
The progression of Acts 10 confirms this interpretation step-by-step:
Peter’s Immediate Reaction (Acts 10:14):
Years after Yeshua’s resurrection, Peter still had never eaten anything common or unclean:
"Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean."
If Yeshua had already abolished dietary laws during His earthly ministry, Peter clearly had never heard of it.
Peter Was Perplexed (Acts 10:17):
"Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean..."
Peter did not jump up and make an unclean meal. He knew the vision was a symbolic riddle and wondered what it actually meant.
The Arrival of the Gentiles (Acts 10:19–20):
While Peter was thinking on the vision, the Holy Spirit told him:
"Behold, three men seek thee. Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I have sent them."
The timing of the men arriving at the gate was the key that unlocked the vision's meaning.
Peter’s Defense to the Apostles in Jerusalem (Acts 11:1–18):
When Peter was challenged by the circumcised believers in Jerusalem for entering the house of uncircumcised men, he recounted the vision from start to finish.
Their conclusion was not about food, but salvation for the nations:
"When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life." (Acts 11:18)
The Crux of the Issue
The barrier being torn down in Acts 10 was not God’s dietary commandments in Leviticus 11, but the man-made rabbinic tradition that forbade Jews from associating with, visiting, or eating in the homes of Gentiles. God used the imagery of unclean animals in the sheet to teach Peter that Gentile men who seek God are no longer to be viewed as untouchable or defiled.
bottom of page

















